Okay, but overrated
Added 9/24/2009
"Half Nelson" is a 2006 independent film starring Ryan Gosling as Mr. Dunne, a white school teacher in an inner-city Brooklyn middle school. Mr. Dunne has noble ambitions of being a positive force in the lives of his students but he's bogged down by a crack habit. He strikes up a much-needed friendship with one of his students, a latchkey 13 year-old black girl named Drey, who accidently discovers his drug problem.
Richard Roeper and Kevin Smith's review on At The Movies called "Half Nelson" a masterpiece that everyone should seek out, view and relish; unfortunately it's not even close to being that good.
Yes, the acting is great across the board, especially Gosling, but acting itself does not a movie make. What's wrong with this film? For one thing, the story plays out in a dreary monotone its entire length (106 minutes) and ends on an unresolved note. Yet, even this doesn't explain why the film fails to be truly good or great; after all, 2004's "The Woodsman" also plays out in a flat, realistic manner and ends somewhat unresolved, but that film is great. So where does "Half Nelson" go wrong?
Although Ryan Gosling is an excellent actor, his character in this film, Mr. Dunne, is lifeless, unlikable, hypocritical and unrepentant; by contrast, Keven Bacon in "The Woodsman" may be lifeless and unlikable, but at least he wasn't hypocritical or unrepentant.
By "lifeless and unlikable" I mean that he lacks vibrancy and inspiration, even when he's in his glory teaching his kids about dialectics & history. There's simply no charisma that would compel anyone to want to seek him out, learn from him or befriend him, like, say, Robin Williams' character in "Dead Poets Society."
By "hypocritical" I mean the obvious: How much of a positive impact could he possibly have on inner-city youths if he himself is addticted to drugs? This brings to mind the absurd scene where Mr. Dunne confronts a drug dealer who's using Drey as a drug deliverer. Dunne doesn't want Drey to be negatively influenced by a drug dealer but it's okay for her to hang out with a pathetic drug addict like himself (?). The scene ends with Dunne having a drink and "candy" with the drug dealer -- lot of good that confrontation did.
By "unrepentant" I mean there's no indication in the story that Dunne desires to or will ultimately choose to detox from his drug habit. He makes the statement that "rehab doesn't work." Okay, that's fine, but do SOMETHING to try to escape your drug problem!
There are other problems with the film:
- The camera bobbles around too much as if to draw attention to itself ("See, this is a realistic slice-of-life picture!") It smacks of pretension.
- The kids in the classroom seem too well-behaved. This is a problem in Anywhere, America, let alone the inner-city.
- Despite Mr. Dunne's monotone dreariness, the viewer does desire to see him escape his addiction and fulfill his noble ambitions. We also come to care about Drey -- will she acquire the wisdom to stay away from drugs (dealing or addiction) and prison or will she too become part of the problem? Unfortunately the film leaves everything up in the air. We don't even know if Dunne still has his job at the end.
I get the points the film is trying to make -- this is an anti-inspirational teacher/mentor movie. There's no by-the-numbers breakthrough for student or teacher. "Half Nelson" isn't concerned with such things; it's concerned with the the simple achievement of going to work every day and accomplishing something beyond oneself, despite a flawed nature and crippling habit. It's a fine point but it could have been done in a much more compelling way.
Don't get me wrong, I don't hate "Half Nelson." I did appreciate quite a few aspects of it, especially Dunne's unlikely friendship with a 13 year-old girl, but the story never rises above its flat dreariness to become anything more than okay.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
Three and a half, really. A Film You Must Have A Little Patience For
Added 9/3/2009
After viewing Lars and the Real Girl, I was so blown away by Ryan Gosling as an actor, I had to pick up another film of his. Half Nelson delivers another stunning performance by Gosling, but the film as a whole doesn't quite live up to Gosling's abilities. No real plot drives the movie, which does provide an interesting character study, but the film does not give the audience enough connection with the characters to keep their attention. It reaches in too many directions, from Dan's addiction to his relationship with various women, to Drey's family life, to her relationship with Frank, to the classroom scenes, that it felt like there was no time to really connect to any of these directions. Too many snapshots tend to blur the overall picture.
The first half of the movie I was so bored with the way it dragged and blurry, unfocused shots with maudlin music to accompany, I contemplated shutting it off. The performances of Shareeka Epps and Gosling were so extraordinary though, they kept me from giving up on this film. I am glad I persevered, because the film picked up steam and asked some interesting questions near the end. The drug-dealer Frank stood out to me as we approached the end as the most complex character, because he seemed to be the only one fleshed out enough to see the complexities of his personality and situation.
The plot of a brilliant, white teacher who teaches at a predominately black inner-city high school immediately conjures up stereotypes from films such as Dangerous Minds or The Principal, and I worried when Half Nelson might plunge into such stereotypes as well. I was pleasantly surprised to discover a richer movie than that, and by the end of the film, I had to applaud the film for not trying to wrap the film up with some overall moral or teaching. I still cannot decide if it completely outweighs the very, very, very slow build-up, but a movie that improves is better than a movie that does not.
Overall, I would recommend this film for anyone with the patience to wait it out. If you're looking for a moderate or fast paced, plot-driven film though, this may not be the movie for you.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
Complete in every way...
Added 6/17/2009
Ok, first thing I'm going to do is address the ending, but before you get all freaked out that I'm going to `say too much', stop worrying. I'm not going to say anything that will spoil the film for you in any way shape or form; I promise.
Many a review will tell you one thing about the ending; it's ambiguous. It leaves the audience at a bit of a cliffhanger, wondering just what is going to happen next. A lot of people have a problem with this kind of an ending; in fact it may have been that very ending that squashed this films hopes of becoming a huge Oscar contender (because, honestly, this film is leagues better than any of the films that the Academy nominated). Our society demands a happy ending. We are so fed up with our own realities that we need to escape into the fabricated happy lives of the Hollywood fairytale where every bad decision leads to a resolve that fixes everything for everyone and makes you feel all warm and fuzzy and ready to face tomorrow. The realist in you tells you that what you are watching is unrealistic but the optimist in you tells you that all you have to do is believe and then `kicking drugs' will really be that easy.
Ha.
Well, `Half Nelson' is not the movie for you if you want a film that will lie to you in the ways most Hollywood films will do. But, if you want a realistic film that broaches a dark subject with some intelligence and compassion then this is the film for you.
`Half Nelson' tells the story of Dan Dunne, a young and energetic teacher who has a knack for reaching his students with his unique teaching style. He also has a really bad drug habit that he uses to cover over the repressed feelings of failure and disapproval he faces in his life. Drey, one of his brightest students, is sweet by nature and sparks something close to curiosity in Dan. Drugs are also a big part of her life, but in a different way. Having seen her brother tossed in prison for dealing you'd think that drugs would be the furthest thing from Drey's mind, but living in a poor neighborhood with little opportunities leaves Drey with only one viable means for escape; drugs. Both Drey and Dan share a common bond; they are both enslaved to the inevitable, but with each others help and understanding they can overcome it.
I got you with that last part, huh? The whole `overcome it' statement. Yeah, I warned you; this is not that type of movie. But, that does not mean that this is not an inspirational film. No matter what the outcome for these characters, their relationship is really a saving grace. The way in which the addict and the inevitable dealer is handled is so beautifully understanding and realistic. These are not your carbon copy junkies and villains; they are real, living, breathing humans with issues that rival yours and mine.
They are you.
They are me.
The acting, as many have already mentioned, is impeccable. It's a shame that Shareeka Epps didn't get more attention for her devastatingly raw portrayal of Drey. She walks toe to toe with Gosling (who managed a deserved Oscar nomination) and delivers a performance that is just as good as his. If only she were a bigger name star (and older, for I'm sure the age thing came up), then she would have garnered an Oscar nomination for sure. I'll admit this too; I was floored by Anthony Mackie. I normally find this actor to be irritating, annoying and the worst part of a movie; but he was stunningly accurate here and exceptionally convincing.
His best performance to date, by a country mile.
From the intimate and realistic script to the intimate and realistic performances, `Half Nelson' is a true independent gem of a film; a movie that gets everything right and then some. One of the best films of the decade and truly one I will remember forever; I recommend this with the highest of praises.
1 out of 1 people found this helpful.
|
2.5 stars out of 4
Added 2/3/2009
The Bottom Line:
Half Nelson features a good performance by Gosling, some nice unexpected moments, and a couple of scenes which should be mandatory viewing for wannabe teachers, but it's too slight and brief to be worth recommending as a film.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
Where is the plot?
Added 12/9/2008
This was a weird, weird movie.... At the end my husband and I looked at each other and said, "that was so weird, what was that about?"
As a teacher, I noticed that his role in the movie as a teacher was completely unrealistic and misleading. Two thumbs down!
2 out of 4 people found this helpful.
|
Mommy, is that man gonna die?
Added 9/30/2009
After seeing the protagonist Henry Lethan (Gosling) sitting beside a traumatic, fiery crash, the film collides into a patient and doctor relationship between Henry and his psychiatrist, Sam Foster (McGregor), sort of a creepy, foreboding version of the relationship between Robin Williams and Matt Damon in Good Will Hunting combined with a little The Sixth Sense flavor. When Henry tells Sam about his suicidal plans to celebrate his 21st birthday in three days, Sam's attempts to save Henry lead to a mind-bending tale of regret, warped déjà vu, and altered consciousness.
Truly a visual masterpiece, Stay flows from one scene to another with creativity similar to interwoven scenes of a filmmaker's representation of an M.C. Escher painting. Blending in a wave of colors and transitioning from one scene to another with some great jump cuts and interesting visual quirks, the cinematography is a surreal dream reminiscent of the originality and innovations in films like The Matrix, Sin City, and Spun. Put it this way, in one red hue saturated, hallucinogenic bar scene, I would swear the filmmakers purposely cast Dr. Ruth and Salvador Dali look-alikes as bar patrons just to make the scene more bizarre. Every scene is an excuse to use color, lighting, shapes, angles, and various editing techniques to accentuate the storyline and express the artistic aspect of filmmaking. It's brilliant.
If you enjoyed the story and twist from The Sixth Sense, then Director Marc Foster's journey, his hybrid version of reality and illusion, is sure to please. And despite some reviewer's displeasure with the ending, I think it's a wonderfully cerebral, thought provoking conclusion.
Jason Elin
1 out of 1 people found this helpful.
|
Watch "STAY" and then watch it again and again...
Added 8/31/2009
This is a film that needs and deserves to be seen more than once. The first viewing you should just immerse yourself in it, absorb the imagery, feel with the characters. If you get confused, stay with it. Then when you watch it again you will start to understand the context and realize just how wonderful it is. It needs to be viewed this way because it takes place primarily inside a human mind processing its own life and death, moving in and out of various states of consciousness. In this world , thoughts become active characters.
It is important that you don't know this initially, so that you experience this reality the same way that Henry does. You must become confused as Henry does and become engaged in the search with him: the search for answers, meaning and ultimately forgiveness. This is the mind's reality and should be the viewer's as well. We can debate later on, if what the mind believes to be real is the true reality. The point is, it believes it to be real and it is real in the sense that it is it's sincere journey, embarked upon with honest fear, grief , guilt, and confusion, trying to make sense of it all .
So you follow Henry's journey, from various states of awareness. Henry's mind in one state, hears the voices and sees some of the faces of the people trying to help him. He pulls in these characters from the outside world ,and creates aspects of himself from them when he goes into a deeper sub-conscious state. Not being aware of what is inside and outside, (`I hear voices, can you tell me which ones are real",) he asks Sam, who enters his world to try and save him.
In this state, the human mind does not realize what characters are actually extensions of it's own personality. So we watch the story of Sam the caring psychiatrist, and Lila the post suicidal artist, who Henry has pulled from the outside world, and creates aspects of himself from them to help him save his life, but they are created from his mind not objective reality. In reality they are the two people closest to him as he lay dying on the street.
He brings these characters and others, into his deeper state, where they converge with the vivid imagery of Henry's past: his thoughts, memories, emotions and artistic perspective. This is a visually stunning world, that shifts often and in interesting ways, the way the sub-conscious works. For example, Lila reflects aspects of Henry's personality, in regard to his own fragile artistic persona, that is also suicidal, can't paint on meds, wonders if their art is any good and if they will be remembered. That they are one and the same is realized by Henry, only when Lila discovers that her art is signed by Henry and she runs to the fence. This is Henry starting to move back towards the conscious world.
The sub-conscious mind as playwright, has its own way of dealing with problems and what it sees makes sense, but it is in a type of code that the conscious mind must translate before there is discovery and understanding. But this is the true life and death struggle of the mind, and it is real. Unlike some gimmick in lesser work, that releases the writer from explanation, and makes the audience feel cheated, this is the authentic reality of the mind. So what you have watched has placed you inside the mind, and rather than detaching you, you have joined in the most intimate way, with another human being. What you come away with after seeing this film is who Henry is, but it is his sub-conscious mind that has told most of the story.
Henry decides that it is too late for him and accepts death. The suicide that occurs on the bridge, ironically jolts him back to life in the conscious world,("I have to wake up now"), where he sees the faces of Sam and Lila trying to help him. Sam tells him that the accident was not his fault, he was driving behind him and saw the tire blow out. This releases Henry from his guilt. My guess is that Henry felt he was to blame because he stopped taking meds so he could paint, and thought it might have affected his driving. (You get hints of that from other places in the film). But it is also from Sam that Henry learns that all the passengers are dead. . At this point , you come to the realization that Henry was driving with Athena,( who he was going to ask to marry him that night, because he had the ring), and his parents, when the accident happens.
As Lila speaks to Henry, he sees the face of his beloved and asks her to marry him. The kind Lila, (who is a nurse), holds him and accepts. Then Henry dies, joining Athena.
When Sam and Lila, (who do not know each other) move away from the body, a flash of Déjà vu occurs. Sam feels some connection to Lila and asks her to have coffee with him. It is possible that a soul that has left his body, but has not moved on yet, can influence the mind of the living. (Henry may have wanted to repay their kindness to him.) There also is the idea of alternate realities.
Whatever conclusion you would choose, Henry has been released from his pain and can move on, and the relationship between Sam and Lila shows promise.
The writing ,direction, and acting are all first rate.
4 out of 4 people found this helpful.
|
Socks shots
Added 4/13/2009
I don't know what the heck this movie is about. It plays with bending time and reality. It's kinetic...too much so. It comes across as chaotic rather than thought provoking. It's set in NY but to me it seemed like Dickens' London which was disorienting. Death seems to be the subject and the cause of death is suicide. Very grim. Needlessly grim in my opinion and what was the obsession with McGregor wearing white socks with his pants short enough to see them? Were they trying to say he was attempting to out run death?
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
