Jason Statham is very good in a very different role for him. Jessica Biel is HOT, but she's not really a big player in this movie. Her character is important, but doesn't get as much screen time as one would expect. Chris Evans was just as mediocre as ever, he might as well have been the Human Torch from Fantastic Four. Movie itself has a great story, just very week execution.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
Watched this with 3 people; 2 loved it, 1 fell asleep
Added 7/9/2009
I was with the two who actually really, really enjoyed this movie. After reading some reviews, I'm just convinced it takes a certain type to "get it." It's either going to strike you as very "ugly" or very honest. Look, it's got excessive drug usage, talks on god and religion, and dysfunctional relationships. It doesn't have a nice ending, but it certainly doesn't leave you feeling like...how you felt after watching "Requiem for a Dream" (yikes, right?). I bought it, and I show it to a certain crowd with good results, you should be able to get the feel if this sort of dialog is something you'd enjoy Oh, and the beginning sex scene is super hot ¬_¬
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
Soggy LONDON not worth the trip
Added 6/22/2009
First time writer and director Hunter Richards delivers a perfectly awful and indulgent low budget tale of an unlikable NYC drughead named Syd (rising young actor Chris Evans) drowning in self pity over the breakup of from his superhot girlfriend London (Jessica Biel) of the title - alas, not the city - and plotting to win her back at her going away party, but only after doing massive amounts of coke and booze with slickly menacing new pal Bateman (Jason Statham, in a largely non-action role) in the party penthouse's palatial bathroom first. Richards' laughable script comes across as an 8th grader's attempt to sound like a college junior's idea of a complex relationship movie, with the party scenes cutting to insufferable flashbacks of Syd and London's druggy sex 'n' scream filled past. As bad as those are, they're still preferable to the bloody wretched extended philosophical discussion between Syd and Bateman during their overly long bathroom coke binge. Slick photography and cool sets can't hide the director's glaring inexperience. At least the actors do what they can with their parts; Evans displays a range and vulnerability missing in his other roles; Biel looks lovely and has real spark; Statham's charisma and comic touch carry him through the worst of the script (even as his shiny brown toupee seriously lets him down); and Dane Cook has an amusing cameo as a party guest. No matter how hard they all work, the amateurish material still undermines them. Of interest only to fans of the talented cast, LONDON the movie deserves a very special place a the bottom of the Thames River in London - the city.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
DON'T WASTE YOUR MONEY!
Added 12/23/2008
This movie was just awful. Just a lot of screaming, yelling and very bad acting. What a waste of time and money for everyone involved (including the viewers).
0 out of 1 people found this helpful.
|
Loved it ... gonna buy it
Added 8/14/2008
Actually, I was having a sleepless night & changing TV channels, i came across this movie where Syed was having an argument with his friend in the toilet. This movie could be boring to some because it limits you between the party-holder-toilet & Syed's Apartment. I loved it because I found it amazing how some guy can be in so deep love with this girl but during their relationship he doesn't show his affection, his passion & his love. They always argue & argue about everything and anything. She leaves him because he is so proud to admit his mistakes & to prove his love. & when he doesn't, he became to know it was already late. It is sad, but down-to-earth.
1 out of 2 people found this helpful.
|
